隨筆

真係痴撚線 凌晨一點喺睡房有隻大曱甴飛出嚟 我攞殺蟲水去噴，一撳落去，屌佢罐殺蟲水停唔到落嚟 為免毒死自己，我情急之下唯有掉佢落廁所

"""why is it impossible to create a perfect sandbox without leaky abstractions? this is because of the principle of resonance here the principle of resonance means the thing which behaves the same regardless of substrate will synchronize in frequency and harmonize as one this is also called simulation for simulation to work and for it to be meaningful, the principle of resonance must be accepted which in practice means that whatever is constructed within the sandbox as long as it is sufficiently similar to the things outside the sandbox, it will resonate and become one. this is the only way the outer experiences the inner, and the way the inner breaks out hence the saying "as above, so below" """

In a very real sense, Trump has discovered that the Chinese-style political system works so well that he's is copying it as fast as possible. First was the one-man-decide-everything authoritarianism; Next came guanxi-based preferential treatment; Then it was bossing governors and mayors like subordinates; Now it's f---ing state owned enterprises. Hell yeah baby, that'd definitely make Intel great again lol

我係提倡眾生平等嘅，不過，真係要講階級嘅話，呢段文字就十分之體現出咩叫做 lower class 無論點掙扎都洗唔走嗰唚除。 誠然，拼學歷拼專業資格可能係佢擠身所謂上流社會嘅唯一 tangible 方法；我亦唔排除真係有「高學歷高收人」嘅男人好在意伴侶係咪有專業資格；不過學歷同個人係咪蠢真係冇關係，同佢係咪襯得起個男人亦冇任何關係，起碼我係咁認為。 自信不足嘅人要搵啲嘢(eg. 學歷、專業資格)去boost自己嘅自信無可厚非，不過呢樣亦都係出賣佢出身同嗰唚除個位。有咗自信做任何嘢都會順暢啲，但唔代表你用嚟 boost 自信嘅工具真係對所有人都係必要。

Trump has discovered that the Chinese-style political system works so well that he's is copying it as fast as possible. First was the one-man-decide-everything authoritarianism; Next came guanxi-based preferential treatment; Then it was bossing governors and mayors like subordinates; Now it's f---ing state owned enterprises. Hell yeah baby, that'd definitely make Intel great again lol

Today I learned Latitude of the Great Pyramid of Giza ~= 29.9792458° N (within reasonable error bars) Whereas speed of light ~= 299,792,458 m/s It's just a coincidence. As to the claim that the meter was invented relatively recently, its original definition was one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole, so in theory peoples from other cultures could have used a similar definition with similar values. The coincidence is still very very uncanny.

四十歲大限就（仲有N個月）到，諗起兩樣嘢。 其一係所謂「不惑之年」。孔子「四十而不惑」，我自問三十歲就已經有決疑嘅系統（照見本老師名句）。呢方面算係另過孔老師。 其二係我多年前某個觀察。「四十歲大限」係講緊，我留意到好多人（尤其係男人）到咗 40+ 嘅年紀之後，自信好似會急升，對住啲經驗比較少嘅人會擺出一副「你識啲乜吖，本老師食鹽多過你食米」嘅態度。呢種自信似乎同能力完全冇correlation，唔知係華人社會定係西方都係咁 （最近喺 threads 同幾位 rando 外國人 boomer 接觸之後認為未必關華人文化事） 其實老屎忽態度同「不惑」係有好微妙嘅關係。覺得自己一定啱都會得出「不惑」嘅效果。講咩做人要謙虛乜乜柒柒其實冇咩用，個核心問題唔係咩「態度」，而係你點對待自己活咗半(個)世(紀)嘅經驗：你信你辛辛苦苦得來嘅經驗，定係信個唔知乜水嘅𡃁仔講嘅嘢？如果你下下都質疑你嘅經驗同經歷，咁你人生就係不斷所有嘢由頭學過，實際上係行唔通嘅。至於點樣判斷邊啲經驗係「啱」定「錯」？ 嘿嘿，係冇方法㗎。（如果你覺得有嘅話，就更加證明我講嘅嘢冇錯。） 所以根本個問題係冇解嘅。不惑仍然係不惑，本老師仲要早過孔老師不惑⋯⋯ 所以終於面對呢個四十歲大限嗰陣，我都唔知會點。嘿嘿。 （對於呢個問題嘅解藥，我係有啲 hypothesis 嘅。不過都未試過，講出嚟咪 9up。嘿。）

Interesting.

If you find these paradoxes confusing, your metaphysics framework is not good enough. These "tests" that assure me I'm on the right path. While people are still debating this crap, I feel like I have clear answers to them, and once you accept and internalize the metaphysics framework the conclusions are not really debatable. (Modern philosophy loves debates though. It's a sign of confusion, not a sign of knowledge intellect or wisdom... I keep wondering what academic institutions are actually doing by encouraging these "debates"...) There are some notable caveats - (1) the "hard" problem of consciousness is still "hard" in the sense that subjective experience is a primitive, mythical axiom that can only be accepted as such, and (2) some of the problems of infinities are technically hard and requires such a broad and deep understanding of applied math that it's way outside my realm of knowledge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fukTu4WjF-A

仲見到啲人話個咩 ICT awards 係「學術」獎，喂其實大家冇讀過書真係應該出少幾句聲