隨筆

記事 格物 留念

si.fong 12/25/25

Dec 29, 2025
「同一件事一直問」係因為一般人唔理解問卜嘅原理
如果求籤要靈,個「信」字好緊要
你唔信個過程或個結果,先至會問第二第三第四次
本身呢個行為都令你之前嘅問答變得冇意義
作為對比,客觀科學世界講究嘅係「大數法則」,同一件事不斷重複,平均結果會趨同。一般世俗方法係多次取樣,提升結果嘅信賴值;但問卜唔係講究平均結果而係要從所謂渾沌中粹取神靈訊息,所以必須反其道而行,「取樣」越少越準。
(我自己通常問0次,一堆工具備而不用;但偶然會貪玩問下,上面啲大佬s都好俾面唔會鬧我⋯

si.fong 12/07/25

Dec 29, 2025

si.fong 12/05/25-2

Dec 29, 2025
>> 女既都唔駛ff自己冇學歷 淨靠姿色會搵到啲咩高質有錢既男仔

明明打開娛樂版隨手都搵到反例
唔知點解啲女成日都覺得姿色冇用而學歷對求偶有用⋯
其實男女都一樣,sell 外表嘅市場最大,再唔係就係其他表面嘅特徵。邊有人得閒 J 你張大學證書?拍拖邊會睇對方銀行帳目? 你嘅內涵邊個得閒去深究?
當然外表亮麗入面完全冇料又唔得,不過內涵唔係用嚟sell,只係太唔掂對方可能頂唔順咁啫。
又話時話,參考返 em.iliawyk 嘅講法,「階級」應該要算係表面特徵嚟。

si.fong 12/05/25

Dec 29, 2025
咁統計上女性marry up係易過男嘅,尤其一夫一妻制崩潰成咁就更加係。
不過講咩「上進心」就真係嘥鳩氣,難聽過粗口。我就算同人講「顯化」(manifestation) 都唔敢講「上進心」。呢啲嘢真係會力不從心嘅。呢個年代成功唔係父幹就係個人運氣 (但,未試過就放棄嗰啲係另一回事,i.e. 「失敗」可以真係因為缺乏「上進心」)。
真係要睇唔起人嘅話,學返上幾輩講「竹門對竹門」好過。

si.fong 11/27/25

Dec 29, 2025
查大俠呢方面真係勁
日本動漫最勁嘅 tropes 佢基本上都寫過
傲嬌只係入門
咩兄妹相X(段譽)
NTR(段正淳夫婦)
禁室培X(虛竹、段譽)
後宮(韋小寶)
SM (阿紫)
咩都齊

si.fong 10/11/25

Dec 29, 2025
每次個市跌幾個 % 就成班友仔彈出嚟話咩股災幣災,真係得罪講句冇錢好心就努力工作,咪搞咁多嘢。本身今年有侵侵大殺四方,局勢已經超唔穩定,如果你仲打算心存僥倖玩槓桿,俾人當韮菜咁割都好正常。

si.fong 10/03/25

Dec 29, 2025
this is a workspace that provides an apparently stable environment
free from the whimsical dream-world-like environments
where we can experiment with or at least ponder about ideas without them instantly manifesting
without which the world will just change too fast for wild thoughts to be a mere fleeting idea

FB Carp 2025-12-29

Dec 29, 2025
呢個 youtube channel 又一年一度咁播放《白色相簿2》
話說,今年睇多一次 WA2 留意到唔少之前漏咗嘅情節⋯
某程度上冬馬條線係講音樂交流,大概係係《四月是你的謊言》嗰種嘅感覺。《四月》雖然都係炒車 ,但絕症係天命(讀音:plot device),本身男女主之間用音樂交流係溝通到嘅,因為兩人都係識音樂。
冬馬最大嘅悲劇位係佢嘗試用音樂傳情,但男主唔完全 get 到。(每次男主指控佢話唔知佢諗乜嗰陣佢都好shock。可以睇返嗰兩(?)次,一次係初吻之前,另一次係「熟練」之前⋯)
鋼琴本身係一種好孤獨嘅樂器:鋼琴唔可以隨身攜帶,所以比較少幾會同其他人夾,多數係獨奏,現代情境仲好興競爭比賽,單打獨鬥。其他樂器就唔同,可以周圍帶,樂器有音域限制亦會令合奏嘅機會多啲。所以女主孤僻性格同佢彈鋼琴並非偶然,係作者精心考慮過嘅。
喺咁嘅前提下,加上女主本身已有少少鍾意嘅男主,佢發現原來男主喺隔籬彈結他,所以隔咗間房配合佢一齊彈⋯⋯ 一個年輕有成嘅鋼琴高手,幫個啱啱開始學結他嘅新手彈伴奏,可以想像係需要幾多愛同耐性,幾多柔情似水。喺呢個看似簡單嘅音樂合奏裡面,真係講咗千言萬語。仲要係整個九月都一直進行。 點.可.能.唔.沉.? 雪菜音樂感好少少 (唱開歌嘛),一聽就明白係咩回事(旁觀者清嘛)。但佢哋嘅音樂交流之間隔咗一埲牆,亦都代表咗佢哋之間嘅情感始終有呢層隔漠。
另外冬馬收到歌詞之後一直廢寢忘餐咁幫佢寫歌,我一開始都 miss 咗原來老師嘗試沒收嗰本嘢就係寫緊嘅歌。 (真係 dllm 明明坐隔籬都仲要咁迂迴咁玩浪漫,難怪最後炒車...)
最後感想係,雖則話男主反應遲緩應負上最大責任,但似乎唯一攻略冬馬正解係完全無視雪菜嘅表示,直接用霸道總裁嘅姿態叫佢留低唔好走 (本身冬馬都係有少少打算去外國同阿媽一齊)。咁樣做法對一個面面俱圓嘅少年嚟講似乎真係太難喇。個校花就喺你面前撒嬌話想同你一齊,法官大人,呢個 gay test 你想 pass 定 fail? 成個炒車場景被精心策劃,真係毫無破綻。

FB Carp 2025-12-27

Dec 29, 2025
可能係我錯覺
印像中唔少以「中文科為身份認同嘅人」(以下簡稱「中文人」) 總係有呢種自卑積怨以致狂妄嘅傾向。唔知係咪因為書入面講嘅王道真理喺現代社會似乎格格不入,定係佢哋熟讀嘅齊家治國良方喺現代社會完全無用武之地,搞到要「淪落」到教書維生。喺教室入面大家心知肚明,學生對教師嘅表面尊重,好多時都係所謂嘅狐假虎威,學生為咗張沙紙不得不唯唯諾諾,教師有冇真正贏得學生嘅尊重就得佢自己知道。
中文科理論上涵蓋嘅內容博大精深,我自己係絕對唔敢輕視嘅。但時代變遷,以前人人都讀聖賢書,上至社會頂流下至貧窮人家,唔會有咩 self-selection;但唔知點解而家啲「中文人」卻係充斥住啲孔乙己之流。(正所謂蜀中無大將,孔乙己揸支鎗) 話就話係傳承文化,實際上話唔定係自我餵屎。嗱,呢個位要重點澄清,傳承嘅文字絕對唔係屎嚟,不過啲人閂埋門自己煮啲咩俾自己食就得佢自己先知,我就只能夠從公開嘅說話推測。言為心聲,聞到臭味,肯定唔係佢喺本論語孟子度食出呢種滋味。至於係佢本人出事,定係成個同好圈子出事我就不得而知。
任何「粉絲會」一旦脫離社會實際情況再俾佢少少公權就會出事,呢個真係唔係任何人嘅個人責任嚟。等於你都唔會無端端叫 DSE 開科 Mirror Studies 然後用公家錢請佢哋啲粉絲會成員做教師。 不過偏偏啲「中文人」就覺得自己啲嘢冇用但又夠膽收公家錢走去教書,呢樣嘢真係十分之好笑嘅事嚟。 (至於啲嘢有冇用? 只能夠講本身係有用嘅,不過好似啲武俠小說劇情咁樣,武術秘笈猶在,心法失傳,威力全無,啲花拳秀腿以為自己好打得。)
可能咩 Mirror Studies 真係離譜咗少少,但啲「中文人」感覺真係好似啲哈利波特粉絲咁,可以將小說劇情背到爛熟,可以推演出各種fan theory、同人fan fic,講得頭頭是道。但哈利波特粉嘅特點係咩?佢哋唔信真正嘅魔法嘛。cosplay 就得,真係實踐巫術嘅話就不了。
子曰:君子無終食之間違仁,造次必於是,顛沛必於是。

FB Carp 2025-12-23-2

Dec 29, 2025
People usually attribute one, or sometimes even two, reasons for an action.
"Why did you do this?" => "Because of XXXX."
It makes the explanation easier to digest. It provides a narrative. A neat story that we all love to hear.
But reality is so much different. Every single thing that happens, happens because the whole universe conspires that it happens. This is not a bold claim, this is simply scientific fact (sans the conspiracy part). We call the parts of the past universe that caused the present the "light cone", and it grows at the speed of light. In theory everything that happens on Earth is affected by everything else on Earth except the most recent hundred milliseconds or so.
But even if we're not talking about the raw, physical level, the single cause narrative also breaks down. People do things for multiple reasons, and very often there is not a single critical reason for a decision, but rather multiple factors all contributing to it. In fact, it can be easily shown that any decision that rests solely on one rational reason is fragile, since if upon further inspection the premise does not hold, the rationale becomes invalid, and the decision will be a wrong one. It is a better situation to have a decision made because all indicators point to it being the right one, but none of them being critical or decisive in its own right.
So when asked "Why did you do this?", the answer is not a neat and tidy story. There is no grand narrative except "this is the will of the universe". Some call it God, the Tao, 天, whatever.
It is the recognition that we ourselves do not make a decision without cause, that makes the decision powerful. The recognition that all that we do is backed by the power of the whole cosmos is such a powerful thought, yet people cling to the idea that perhaps one single egoistic thought could be a reason for a decision or event.
I still love neat and tidy stories, but the same objective event can be told in so many different ways. Reality is the sum of them all.